Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology ›› 2020, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 938-945.doi: 10.7679/j.issn.2095-1353.2020.096
• Research Articles • Previous Articles
Xiang-Zhong MAO1(), Bin YANG2, Yun-Qiang MA2, Ning ZHAO1,2,***()
Received:
2019-09-15
Accepted:
2020-03-05
Online:
2020-07-27
Published:
2020-09-02
Contact:
Ning ZHAO
E-mail:915506357@qq.com;lijiangzhn@163.com
Xiang-Zhong MAO, Bin YANG, Yun-Qiang MA, Ning ZHAO. EAG and behavioral responses of Cacia cretifera thibetana to seven walnut tree volatiles[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2020, 57(4): 938-945.
化合物名称Compound name | 纯度(%)Purity | 来源 Source of supply |
---|---|---|
1-石竹烯 1-caryophyllene | 95 | Sigma公司 |
壬醛 Nonanal | ≥95 | Sigma公司 |
α-蒎烯 α-pinene | ≥98 | Sigma公司 |
β-蒎烯β-pinene | ≥97 | Sigma公司 |
桉叶油醇 Cineole | 99 | 上海晶纯试剂有限公司 |
反式-2-己烯醛 (2E)-hexenal | 98 | 上海晶纯试剂有限公司 |
正己醛 Hexanal | 97 | 上海晶纯试剂有限公司 |
Table 1 Information for seven standard compounds
化合物名称Compound name | 纯度(%)Purity | 来源 Source of supply |
---|---|---|
1-石竹烯 1-caryophyllene | 95 | Sigma公司 |
壬醛 Nonanal | ≥95 | Sigma公司 |
α-蒎烯 α-pinene | ≥98 | Sigma公司 |
β-蒎烯β-pinene | ≥97 | Sigma公司 |
桉叶油醇 Cineole | 99 | 上海晶纯试剂有限公司 |
反式-2-己烯醛 (2E)-hexenal | 98 | 上海晶纯试剂有限公司 |
正己醛 Hexanal | 97 | 上海晶纯试剂有限公司 |
化合物Compounds | 性别Sex | EAG反应相对值Relative EAG response | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.000 4 mol×L–1 | 0.004 mol×L–1 | 0.04 mol×L–1 | 0. 4 mol×L–1 | 2 mol×L–1 | ||
α-蒎烯α-pinene | 雄性成虫Adult male | 0.96±0.01dD | 0.98±0.06dD | 1.21±0.03cC | 1.56±0.04aA | 1.32±0.02bB |
雌性成虫Adult female | 0.94±0.02 cC | 0.94±0.01 cC | 0.99±0.02 cC | 1.52±0.08 aA | 1.31±0.02 bB | |
β-蒎烯 β-pinene | 雄性成虫Adult male | 0.95±0.01 cC | 1.01±0.04 cC | 0.99±0.05 cC | 1.44±0.04 aA | 1.20±0.07 bB |
雌性成虫Adult female | 0.92±0.01dD | 0.97±0.01 cdCD | 1.03±0.06cdCD | 1.53±0.03aA | 1.31±0.04bB | |
1-石竹烯1-caryophyllene | 雄性成虫Adult male | 0.89±0.01cC | 0.96±0.01cC | 1.24±0.07bB | 1.72±0.08aA | 1.58±0.04aA |
雌性成虫Adult female | 0.82±0.01dD | 0.94±0.02dD | 1.28±0.05cC | 1.81±0.07aA | 1.49±0.04bB | |
壬醛Nonanal | 雄性成虫Adult male | 0.93±0.01dD | 0.93±0.01dD | 1.22±0.03cC | 1.74±0.03aA | 1.35±0.03bB |
雌性成虫Adult female | 0.94±0.01dD | 0.95±0.01dD | 1.28±0.01cC | 1.84±0.03aA | 1.42±0.02bB | |
桉叶油醇Cineole | 雄性成虫Adult male | 0.89±0.01deD | 0.97±0.01cC | 0.95±0.01cdC | 1.41±0.03aA | 1.20±0.03bB |
雌性成虫Adult female | 0.88±0.01dD | 0.94±0.01cC | 0.96±0.01cC | 1.43±0.02aA | 1.21±0.02bB | |
反式-2-己烯醛 (2E)-hexenal | 雄性成虫Adult male | 0.87±0.01eD | 0.95±0.01dCD | 1.07±0.05cC | 1.52±0.02aA | 1.39±0.01bB |
雌性成虫Adult female | 0.89±0.02eC | 0.95±0.01dC | 1.21±0.02cB | 1.40±0.02aA | 1.33±0.03aA | |
正己醛 Hexanal | 雄性成虫Adult male | 0.87±0.02dC | 0.94±0.01cdC | 0.97±0.01cC | 1.48±0.02aA | 1.21±0.05bB |
雌性成虫Adult female | 0.91±0.02dD | 0.91±0.01dCD | 1.12±0.05cBC | 1.54±0.06aA | 1.31±0.01bB |
Table 2 EAG responses of male and female adults in Cacia cretifera thibetana to seven compounds at different concentrations from walnut
化合物Compounds | 性别Sex | EAG反应相对值Relative EAG response | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.000 4 mol×L–1 | 0.004 mol×L–1 | 0.04 mol×L–1 | 0. 4 mol×L–1 | 2 mol×L–1 | ||
α-蒎烯α-pinene | 雄性成虫Adult male | 0.96±0.01dD | 0.98±0.06dD | 1.21±0.03cC | 1.56±0.04aA | 1.32±0.02bB |
雌性成虫Adult female | 0.94±0.02 cC | 0.94±0.01 cC | 0.99±0.02 cC | 1.52±0.08 aA | 1.31±0.02 bB | |
β-蒎烯 β-pinene | 雄性成虫Adult male | 0.95±0.01 cC | 1.01±0.04 cC | 0.99±0.05 cC | 1.44±0.04 aA | 1.20±0.07 bB |
雌性成虫Adult female | 0.92±0.01dD | 0.97±0.01 cdCD | 1.03±0.06cdCD | 1.53±0.03aA | 1.31±0.04bB | |
1-石竹烯1-caryophyllene | 雄性成虫Adult male | 0.89±0.01cC | 0.96±0.01cC | 1.24±0.07bB | 1.72±0.08aA | 1.58±0.04aA |
雌性成虫Adult female | 0.82±0.01dD | 0.94±0.02dD | 1.28±0.05cC | 1.81±0.07aA | 1.49±0.04bB | |
壬醛Nonanal | 雄性成虫Adult male | 0.93±0.01dD | 0.93±0.01dD | 1.22±0.03cC | 1.74±0.03aA | 1.35±0.03bB |
雌性成虫Adult female | 0.94±0.01dD | 0.95±0.01dD | 1.28±0.01cC | 1.84±0.03aA | 1.42±0.02bB | |
桉叶油醇Cineole | 雄性成虫Adult male | 0.89±0.01deD | 0.97±0.01cC | 0.95±0.01cdC | 1.41±0.03aA | 1.20±0.03bB |
雌性成虫Adult female | 0.88±0.01dD | 0.94±0.01cC | 0.96±0.01cC | 1.43±0.02aA | 1.21±0.02bB | |
反式-2-己烯醛 (2E)-hexenal | 雄性成虫Adult male | 0.87±0.01eD | 0.95±0.01dCD | 1.07±0.05cC | 1.52±0.02aA | 1.39±0.01bB |
雌性成虫Adult female | 0.89±0.02eC | 0.95±0.01dC | 1.21±0.02cB | 1.40±0.02aA | 1.33±0.03aA | |
正己醛 Hexanal | 雄性成虫Adult male | 0.87±0.02dC | 0.94±0.01cdC | 0.97±0.01cC | 1.48±0.02aA | 1.21±0.05bB |
雌性成虫Adult female | 0.91±0.02dD | 0.91±0.01dCD | 1.12±0.05cBC | 1.54±0.06aA | 1.31±0.01bB |
化合物Compounds | EAG反应相对值 Relative EAG response | |
---|---|---|
雌性成虫 Adult female | 雄性成虫 Adult male | |
α-蒎烯α-pinene | 1.56±0.04Ab | 1.52±0.08Ab |
β-蒎烯β-pinene | 1.44±0.04Abc | 1.53±0.03Ab |
1-石竹烯 1-caryophyllene | 1.72±0.08Aa | 1.81±0.07Aa |
壬醛 Nonanal | 1.74±0.03Aa | 1.84±0.03Aa |
桉叶油醇 Cineole | 1.41±0.03Ac | 1.43±0.02Abc |
反式-2-己烯醛(2E)-hexenal | 1.52±0.02A bc | 1.40±0.02Ac |
正己醛Hexanal | 1.48±0.02A bc | 1.54±0.06Ab |
Table 3 EAG responses of male and female adults in Cacia cretifera thibetana to different compounds from walnut(0.4 mol×L–1)
化合物Compounds | EAG反应相对值 Relative EAG response | |
---|---|---|
雌性成虫 Adult female | 雄性成虫 Adult male | |
α-蒎烯α-pinene | 1.56±0.04Ab | 1.52±0.08Ab |
β-蒎烯β-pinene | 1.44±0.04Abc | 1.53±0.03Ab |
1-石竹烯 1-caryophyllene | 1.72±0.08Aa | 1.81±0.07Aa |
壬醛 Nonanal | 1.74±0.03Aa | 1.84±0.03Aa |
桉叶油醇 Cineole | 1.41±0.03Ac | 1.43±0.02Abc |
反式-2-己烯醛(2E)-hexenal | 1.52±0.02A bc | 1.40±0.02Ac |
正己醛Hexanal | 1.48±0.02A bc | 1.54±0.06Ab |
化合物Compounds | 浓度 (mol×L–1)Concentration | 引诱率 (%) Luring rate | 趋避率 (%) Repellent rate | 反应率 (%) Response rate | T-检验 T-test | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雌虫 Female | 雄虫 Male | 雌虫 Female | 雄虫 Male | 雌虫 Female | 雄虫 Male | 雌虫 Female | 雄虫 Male | ||
α-蒎烯 α-pinene | 0.000 4 | 20 | 15 | 25 | 20 | 45 | 35 | 0.473 | 0.573 |
0.004 | 30 | 25 | 20 | 15 | 50 | 40 | 0.407 | 0.571 | |
0.04 | 45 | 45 | 20 | 25 | 65 | 70 | 0.217 | 0.554 | |
0.4 | 65 | 55 | 25 | 30 | 90 | 85 | 0.036* | 0.048* | |
2 | 92 | 82 | 2 | 8 | 94 | 90 | 0.000** | 0.000** | |
β-蒎烯 β-pinene | 0.000 4 | 15 | 35 | 25 | 25 | 40 | 60 | 0.261 | 0.625 |
0.004 | 30 | 35 | 15 | 30 | 45 | 65 | 0.542 | 0.831 | |
0.04 | 40 | 50 | 15 | 20 | 55 | 70 | 0.243 | 0.163 | |
0.4 | 60 | 70 | 10 | 15 | 70 | 85 | 0.032* | 0.009** | |
2 | 93 | 87 | 0 | 5 | 93 | 92 | 0.000** | 0.001** | |
1-石竹烯 1-caryophyllene | 0.000 4 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 25 | 0.407 | 0.573 |
0.004 | 20 | 25 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 45 | 1.000 | 0.573 | |
0.04 | 40 | 30 | 25 | 20 | 65 | 50 | 0.389 | 0.647 | |
0.4 | 55 | 50 | 15 | 30 | 70 | 80 | 0.003** | 0.046* | |
2 | 87 | 82 | 3 | 5 | 90 | 87 | 0.000** | 0.002** | |
壬醛 Nonanal | 0.000 4 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 20 | 35 | 40 | 0.091 | 1.000 |
0.004 | 35 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 45 | 35 | 0.018* | 0.140 | |
0.04 | 45 | 40 | 15 | 10 | 60 | 50 | 0.002** | 0.020* | |
0.4 | 80 | 70 | 5 | 5 | 85 | 75 | 0.000** | 0.001** | |
2 | 95 | 82 | 0 | 2 | 95 | 84 | 0.000** | 0.000** | |
桉叶油醇 Cineole | 0.000 4 | 25 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 40 | 30 | 0.070 | 0.196 |
0.004 | 30 | 20 | 20 | 25 | 50 | 45 | 0.158 | 0.482 | |
0.04 | 40 | 35 | 20 | 10 | 60 | 45 | 0.038 * | 0.012* | |
0.4 | 55 | 55 | 20 | 10 | 75 | 65 | 0.006** | 0.001** | |
2 | 88 | 80 | 0 | 2 | 88 | 82 | 0.000** | 0.000** | |
反式-2-己烯醛 (2E)-hexenal | 0.0004 | 25 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 40 | 30 | 0.288 | 0.435 |
0.004 | 20 | 30 | 15 | 25 | 35 | 55 | 0.613 | 0.288 | |
0.04 | 45 | 50 | 15 | 25 | 60 | 75 | 0.021* | 0.004** | |
0.4 | 60 | 70 | 10 | 15 | 70 | 85 | 0.001** | 0.004** | |
2 | 83 | 80 | 2 | 0 | 85 | 80 | 0.000** | 0.000** | |
正己醛 Hexanal | 0.0004 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 20 | 40 | 30 | 0.070 | 0.196 |
0.004 | 20 | 10 | 40 | 30 | 60 | 40 | 0.047* | 0.036* | |
0.04 | 35 | 30 | 55 | 45 | 90 | 75 | 0.026* | 0.021* | |
0.4 | 10 | 10 | 70 | 60 | 80 | 70 | 0.002* | 0.001* | |
2 | 3 | 2 | 87 | 78 | 90 | 79 | 0.000** | 0.000** |
Table 4 Behavioral responses of male and female adults in Cacia cretifera thibetana to seven compounds from walnut
化合物Compounds | 浓度 (mol×L–1)Concentration | 引诱率 (%) Luring rate | 趋避率 (%) Repellent rate | 反应率 (%) Response rate | T-检验 T-test | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雌虫 Female | 雄虫 Male | 雌虫 Female | 雄虫 Male | 雌虫 Female | 雄虫 Male | 雌虫 Female | 雄虫 Male | ||
α-蒎烯 α-pinene | 0.000 4 | 20 | 15 | 25 | 20 | 45 | 35 | 0.473 | 0.573 |
0.004 | 30 | 25 | 20 | 15 | 50 | 40 | 0.407 | 0.571 | |
0.04 | 45 | 45 | 20 | 25 | 65 | 70 | 0.217 | 0.554 | |
0.4 | 65 | 55 | 25 | 30 | 90 | 85 | 0.036* | 0.048* | |
2 | 92 | 82 | 2 | 8 | 94 | 90 | 0.000** | 0.000** | |
β-蒎烯 β-pinene | 0.000 4 | 15 | 35 | 25 | 25 | 40 | 60 | 0.261 | 0.625 |
0.004 | 30 | 35 | 15 | 30 | 45 | 65 | 0.542 | 0.831 | |
0.04 | 40 | 50 | 15 | 20 | 55 | 70 | 0.243 | 0.163 | |
0.4 | 60 | 70 | 10 | 15 | 70 | 85 | 0.032* | 0.009** | |
2 | 93 | 87 | 0 | 5 | 93 | 92 | 0.000** | 0.001** | |
1-石竹烯 1-caryophyllene | 0.000 4 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 25 | 0.407 | 0.573 |
0.004 | 20 | 25 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 45 | 1.000 | 0.573 | |
0.04 | 40 | 30 | 25 | 20 | 65 | 50 | 0.389 | 0.647 | |
0.4 | 55 | 50 | 15 | 30 | 70 | 80 | 0.003** | 0.046* | |
2 | 87 | 82 | 3 | 5 | 90 | 87 | 0.000** | 0.002** | |
壬醛 Nonanal | 0.000 4 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 20 | 35 | 40 | 0.091 | 1.000 |
0.004 | 35 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 45 | 35 | 0.018* | 0.140 | |
0.04 | 45 | 40 | 15 | 10 | 60 | 50 | 0.002** | 0.020* | |
0.4 | 80 | 70 | 5 | 5 | 85 | 75 | 0.000** | 0.001** | |
2 | 95 | 82 | 0 | 2 | 95 | 84 | 0.000** | 0.000** | |
桉叶油醇 Cineole | 0.000 4 | 25 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 40 | 30 | 0.070 | 0.196 |
0.004 | 30 | 20 | 20 | 25 | 50 | 45 | 0.158 | 0.482 | |
0.04 | 40 | 35 | 20 | 10 | 60 | 45 | 0.038 * | 0.012* | |
0.4 | 55 | 55 | 20 | 10 | 75 | 65 | 0.006** | 0.001** | |
2 | 88 | 80 | 0 | 2 | 88 | 82 | 0.000** | 0.000** | |
反式-2-己烯醛 (2E)-hexenal | 0.0004 | 25 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 40 | 30 | 0.288 | 0.435 |
0.004 | 20 | 30 | 15 | 25 | 35 | 55 | 0.613 | 0.288 | |
0.04 | 45 | 50 | 15 | 25 | 60 | 75 | 0.021* | 0.004** | |
0.4 | 60 | 70 | 10 | 15 | 70 | 85 | 0.001** | 0.004** | |
2 | 83 | 80 | 2 | 0 | 85 | 80 | 0.000** | 0.000** | |
正己醛 Hexanal | 0.0004 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 20 | 40 | 30 | 0.070 | 0.196 |
0.004 | 20 | 10 | 40 | 30 | 60 | 40 | 0.047* | 0.036* | |
0.04 | 35 | 30 | 55 | 45 | 90 | 75 | 0.026* | 0.021* | |
0.4 | 10 | 10 | 70 | 60 | 80 | 70 | 0.002* | 0.001* | |
2 | 3 | 2 | 87 | 78 | 90 | 79 | 0.000** | 0.000** |
[1] |
Bertschy C, Turlings TCJ, Bellotti AC , 1997. Chemically-mediated attraction of three parasitoid species to mealybug-infested cassava leaves. Florida Entomologist, 80(3):383-395.
doi: 10.2307/3495771 URL |
[2] | Bi YG, Guo L, Wang ZG, Lu F, Yan AH , 2017. Electroantennogram and behavioral responses of Apriona germari to five plant volatiles and theirs mixtures. Science of Sericulture, 43(1):32-38. |
[ 毕拥国, 郭丽, 王志刚, 吕飞, 阎爱华 , 2017. 桑天牛对5种植物源挥发性化合物及其混合物的触角电位和行为反应. 蚕业科学, 43(1):32-38.] | |
[3] | Cao LJ, Liu Q, Zhu GP, Li M, Chen YP, Chen YT, Xie X , 2015. EAG and olfactory behavioral responses of Asias halodendri to sevenvolatiles from Hippophae rhamnoidea. Journal of Tianjin Normal University, 35(3):84-88. |
[ 曹丽娟, 刘强, 朱耿平, 李敏, 陈艳萍, 陈易彤, 谢晓 , 2015. 红缘天牛对沙棘7种挥发物的EAG和嗅觉行为反应. 天津师范大学学报, 35(3):84-88.] | |
[4] | Cai XN, Huang DZ , 2009. Recognition and identification of damage features of main longhorn beetles in China. Forest Pest and Disease, 28(6):37-40. |
[ 蔡小娜, 黄大庄 , 2009. 中国主要天牛危害状识别鉴定研究. 中国森林病虫, 28(6):37-40.] | |
[5] | Chen YX, Ding XJ , 2016. Damage characteristics and comprehensive prevention and control technology of Anoplophora nobilis. Science and Technology of Qinghai Agriculture and Forestry, ( 1):43-45. |
[ 陈玉祥, 丁小菊 , 2016. 黄斑星天牛危害特点及综合防控技术. 青海农林科技, ( 1):43-45.] | |
[6] | Fan LQ, Sun ZH, Meng ZJ , 2013. EAG and behavioral responses of asian longhorn beetle Anoplophora glabripennis(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to plant volatiles. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 32(1):142-148. |
[ 范丽清, 孙宗华, 孟昭君 , 2013. 光肩星天牛对植物源挥发物的触角电位和行为反应. 生态学杂志, 32(1):142-148.] | |
[7] | Hao DJ, Fan BQ, Tang JG, Wang Y, Ma FL , 2009. Screening of attractants for Monochamus alternatus and its attraction effects. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 37(11):86-87. |
[ 郝德君, 樊斌琦, 唐进根, 王焱, 马凤林 , 2009. 松墨天牛引诱剂的筛选及其引诱作用. 东北林业大学学报, 37(11):86-87.] | |
[8] | Ikeda T, Enda N, Yamane A, Oda K, Toyoda T , 1980. Attractants forthe japanese pine sawyer, Monochamus alternatus Hope. Japanese Society of Applied Entomology and Zoology, 15(3):358-361. |
[9] | Jia XJ, Ma J, Gao B, Li XH, Zhang T, Chen SL, Wang RY , 2017. EAG and olfactory responses of Cylas formicarius(Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to volatiles from plants of different sweetpotato cultivars. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 60(11):1285-1291. |
[ 贾小俭, 马娟, 高波, 李秀花, 张涛, 陈书龙, 王容燕 , 2017. 甘薯蚁象对不同甘薯品种植物挥发物的EAG和嗅觉反. 应用昆虫学报, 60(11):1285-1291.] | |
[10] | Li S, Gao W, Chen XC, Zhou YT, Cui WC , 2016. Electroantennogram response of Anoplophora glabripennis(Motsch.) to Acer negundo volatiles. Forest Pest and Disease, 35(2):9-14. |
[ 李硕, 高薇, 程相称, 周艳涛, 崔伟婵 , 2016. 光肩星天牛对复叶槭挥发物的触角电位及行为反应. 中国森林病虫, 35(2):9-14.] | |
[11] | Liu XH , 2011. The development of phyto-attractant of Chlorophorus sp. Master dissertation. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. |
[ 刘鑫海 , 2011. 柠条绿虎天牛植物源引诱剂开发. 硕士学位论文. 北京: 北京林业大学.] | |
[12] | Liu Y, Guo GX, Chen JL, Ni HX , 2005. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of four predatory insect species to semiochemicals of wheat. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 48(2):161-165. |
[ 刘勇, 郭光喜, 陈巨莲, 倪汉祥 , 2005. 瓢虫和草蛉对小麦挥发物组分的行为及电生理反应. 昆虫学报, 48(2):161-165.] | |
[13] | Luo YP , 2013. The host choice behavior of Anoplophora glabripenn and theresearch of lure from host. Master dissertation. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A & F University. |
[ 罗亚萍 , 2013. 光肩星天牛的寄主选择行为和植物源引诱剂研究. 硕士学位论文. 杭州: 浙江农林大学.] | |
[14] | Ma Y, Shi LY, Zhao Y, Xu HC , 2018. Comparison of volatiles released from the host juglans mandshurica indifferent damaged states and the GC-EAD and behavioral responses of Apriona germari(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to these volatiles. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 61(5):574-584. |
[ 马艳, 史黎央, 赵艺, 徐华潮 , 2018. 不同危害状态下寄主山核桃挥发物成分的比较及桑天牛对其组分的GC-EAD和行为反应. 昆虫学报, 61(5):574-584.] | |
[15] | Mao XZ, Li ZB, Yang B, Zhao N , 2020. Changes on volatile components in walnut bark and leaves induced by Cacia cretifera thibetana. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 49(1):18-23. |
[ 毛祥忠, 李宗波, 杨斌, 赵宁 , 2020. 西藏簇角缨象天牛取食诱导核桃树皮和树叶挥发性成分的变化. 福建农林大学学报, 49(1):18-23.] | |
[16] |
Nehme ME, Keena MA, Zhang A, Baker TC, Xu Z, Hoover K , 2010. Evaluating the use of male-produced pheromone components and plant volatiles in two trap designs to monitor Anoplophora glabripennis. Environmental Entomology, 39(1):169-176.
doi: 10.1603/EN09177 URL pmid: 20146854 |
[17] | Su YM, Luo HF, Yang B, Yang DQ, Li XH, Yang FZ , 2011. Study on olfactory behavior of spodoptera exigua on rosa chinensis infected by Podosphaera pannosa. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 39(8):4567-4569. |
[ 苏艳梅, 罗恒飞, 杨斌, 杨德强, 李向红, 杨发忠 , 2011. 甜菜夜蛾对白粉菌侵染的中国月季的嗅觉行为研究. 安徽农业科学, 39(8):4567-4569.] | |
[18] | Sun P , 2018. Analysis of the volatiles of Lygus pmtensis host plants and its inducement. Master dissertation. Xinjiang: Tarim University. |
[ 孙鹏 , 2018. 寄主植物挥发物分析及其对牧草盲蝽成虫的引诱作用. 硕士学位论文. 新疆: 塔里木大学.] | |
[19] | Tan LK, Wang WK, Li CR , 2008. Progress on integrated control of longhorn beetles in China. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 47(2):232-237. |
[ 谭亮魁, 王文凯, 李传仁 , 2008. 中国天牛综合防治研究进展. 湖北农业科学, 47(2):232-237.] | |
[20] |
Wong JCH, Zou Y, Millar JG, Hanks LM , 2017. Attraction of cerambycid beetles to their aggregation-sex pheromones is influenced byvolatiles from host plants of their larvae. Environmental Entomology, 46(3):649-653.
doi: 10.1093/ee/nvx067 URL pmid: 28402490 |
[21] | Wang BX, Yang S, Yang W, Yang CP, Cai Y, Zhou M, He XH , 2014. EAG and behavioral responses of Batocera lineolata Chevrolat to ten plant volatiles. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 51(2):481-489. |
[ 王保新, 杨桦, 杨伟, 杨春平, 蔡艳, 周梦, 何晓华 , 2014. 云斑天牛对10种植物挥发物的EAG和行为反应. 应用昆虫学报, 51(2):481-489.] | |
[22] |
Williams DW, Li GF, Gao RT , 2004. Tracking movements of individual Anoplophora glabripennis(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) adults: Application of harmonic radar. Environmental Entomology, 33(3):644-649.
doi: 10.1603/0046-225X-33.3.644 URL |
[23] |
Wang X, Xu J, Sheng YL , 2009. Electroantennogram responses of Maruca testulalis Geyer to plant volatiles and sexpheromone. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 20(8):1973-1979.
URL pmid: 19947220 |
[ 王霞, 徐静, 沈幼莲 , 2009. 豆野螟成虫触角对植物挥发性和性信息素化合物的触角电位反应. 应用生态学报, 20(8):1973-1979.]
pmid: 19947220 |
|
[24] | Yan SC, Chen H, Yang H, Yuan HE, Zhang J, Chi DF , 2006. Effects of plant volatiles on the EAG response and behavior of the grey tiger longicorn, Xylotrechus rusticus Linnaeus. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 49(5):759-767. |
[ 严善春, 程红, 杨慧, 袁红娥, 张健, 迟德富 , 2006. 青杨脊虎天牛对植物源挥发物的EAG和行为反应. 昆虫学报, 49(5):759-767.] | |
[25] | Yan SC, Sun JH, Chi DF, Zhang DD, Zhao QK , 2003. The repellency effects of plant volatiles to Strobilomyia spp. damaging larch cones. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23(2):314-319. |
[ 严善春, 孙江华, 迟德富, 张丹丹, 赵启凯 , 2003. 植物挥发性物质对落叶松球果花蝇的趋避效果. 生态学报, 23(2):314-319.] | |
[26] | Yan XF, Liu YH, Li G, He Y, Liu XY, Liu L , 2016. EAG and olfactory behavioral responses of Asias halodendri to six volatiles from Chinese Jujube tree. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, ( 36):177-181. |
[ 阎雄飞, 刘永华, 李刚, 贺英, 刘晓英, 刘列 , 2016. 红缘天牛对枣树6种挥发物EAG和嗅觉行为反应. 中国农学通报, ( 36):177-181.] | |
[27] | Zhang L, Zhang LS, Zhang YF, Xu ZC , 2016. EAG and behavioral responses of Arhopalus rusticus Linn to Pinus tabuliformis carr volatile. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 44(9):99-102. |
[ 张霖, 张连生, 张永福, 许志春 , 2016. 褐梗天牛对油松挥发物的EAG和行为反应. 东北林业大学学报, 44(9):99-102.] | |
[28] | Zhang L , 2016. Study on the biology and attractants of Arhopalus rusticus (Linnaeus). Master dissertation. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. |
[ 张霖 , 2016. 褐梗天牛生物学特性和引诱剂的初步研究. 硕士学位论文. 北京: 北京林业大学.] | |
[29] | Zhang Y, Wang XW, Zhang LL, Li M, Liu Q , 2017. EAG and behavioral responses of Asias halodendri to the volatiles of Vitis vinifera. Journal of Tianjin Normal University, 37(2):30-35. |
[ 张嫣, 王星霁, 张玲玲, 李敏, 刘强 , 2017. 红缘天牛成虫对葡萄挥发物的EAG和行为反应. 天津师范大学学报, 37(2):30-35.] | |
[30] | Zhang YF, Wang XY , 2019. Advances in biological control of Anoplophora chinensis Forster. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 35(1):136-147. |
[ 张宇凡, 王小艺 , 2019. 星天牛生物防治研究进展. 中国生物防治学报, 35(1):136-147.] | |
[31] | Zhang YH , 2016. Study on attractant effect of rice volatiles on Chilo suppressalis and rice parasitoid wasps. Master dissertation. Zhejiang: Zhejiang University. |
[ 张宇皓 , 2016. 水稻挥发物对二化螟及稻田寄生蜂的引诱效果研究. 硕士学位论文. 浙江: 浙江大学.] | |
[32] | Zhuge PP, Luo SL, Wang MQ, Zhang G , 2010. Electrophysiological responses of Batocera horsfieldi(Hope) adults to plant volatiles. Journal of Applied Entomology, 134(7):600-607. |
[33] | Zhuo ZH, Yang W, Xu DP, Yang CP, Yang S, Liu CS , 2016. Volatile components in bark and leaf of host plant Juglans regia L. of Batocera lineolata Chevrolat. Journal of Northwest A&F University, 44(5):205-214. |
[ 卓志航, 杨伟, 徐丹萍, 杨春平, 杨桦, 刘臣山 , 2016. 云斑天牛寄主核桃树皮及树叶的挥发性成分. 西北农林科技大学学报, 44(5):205-214.] |
No related articles found! |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||